Requirements → Test Scenarios

Runs in browser Test Design

Group requirements into scenarios, identify cross-requirement flows and produce a coverage map showing which scenarios exercise which requirements.

Privacy: This tool runs entirely in your browser. Your input never leaves your device.

How to use Requirements → Test Scenarios

  1. Paste the functional requirements, one per line.
  2. Generate to see scenarios and the coverage map.
  3. Resolve any uncovered requirement warnings and export.

Requirements → Test Scenarios features

  • Groups requirements by kind into end-to-end scenarios with negative counterparts
  • Cross-requirement journeys that exercise several requirements in sequence
  • Regression smoke and permission-matrix scenarios
  • Coverage map from requirement to scenario ids, with warnings for gaps
  • Export as Markdown, JSON, CSV or Gherkin

Requirements → Test Scenarios example

Cart requirements

Input:

1. Customers can add products to a cart.
2. Quantity must be between 1 and 10.
3. Checkout requires a verified email.

Output:

TS-001  Core functional flow                              covers REQ-01
TS-002  Core functional flow — negative and exception paths
TS-003  Input validation and error handling               covers REQ-02
TS-005  Authentication, authorisation and data protection covers REQ-03
TS-007  Permission and role matrix                        covers REQ-01, REQ-03

Frequently asked questions about Requirements → Test Scenarios

How are requirements grouped into scenarios?

By kind — functional flow, validation, security, performance, UI, data and integration — with a negative counterpart for functional and validation groups, cross-requirement journeys and a permission matrix.

What is the coverage map?

A table showing which scenario ids exercise each requirement and how many; uncovered requirements are reported as warnings so nothing slips through.

What are cross-requirement journeys?

Sequences of consecutive functional requirements executed by one user in one session, which reveal integration issues single-requirement tests miss.